Hey
there, readers! This is the post for which you've all been waiting!
The second part of my thoughts on LOTR and Narnia, and ultimately,
the issue of magic. And I do sincerely apologize for taking so long
to post this.
A
quick warning: Be prepared to do a lot of reading. This is a really
long post. :)
Many
people I know have said (and I quote directly from an acquaintance
not on blogger), “What's the difference between Harry Potter and
Lord of the Rings? They both have the same kind of magic in them.”
It's a question I've long wanted to answer, so, as you can guess,
this post is mainly about contrasting the magic in LOTR/Narnia and
Harry Potter.
 |
| Theoden and Eowyn |
I've
wanted to study this issue for a long time now and truly discover the
truth about it. I sort of knew that there was a difference, but if
you asked me, I would only respond with vague answers. You see, I
really wasn't sure. But I was certain there was a difference. I mean,
Harry Potter was just downright evil, and Lord of the Rings and
Narnia were... totally different, right? They just had to be. But
were they? To tell you the truth, I was afraid of getting into study
and finding out that the magic in LOTR and Narnia was evil, so for
the longest time I kept pushing the research off. I am ashamed to
admit that I didn't want to know about it if it was going to be bad.
Then
Petie posted her thoughts on LOTR and Narnia, and the question of
magic was once again pushed into the front of my mind. “This is it,
Kiri,” I told myself. “Stop making excuses. Just research it.”
So,
I did.
And
I am not sorry that I did.
You
know what I found? Oh, yes. I found a lot. This topic is much bigger
than most people think it to be, and there's so much that can be
researched and found.
 |
| Samwise |
Okay,
before I go any further, I must put this note in: What I say here is
not meant to change your opinions toward Narnia and Lord of the
Rings. I am not trying to attack or challenge your beliefs. I respect
each and every one of your opinions, and I realize that choice is
between you, your parents, and the Lord. Here I am simply trying to
answer the question and share my own research and what the Lord has
impressed upon my heart.
Please
also know this: You cannot automatically say just because there's
magic in something, you must have nothing to do with it. I am not
promoting magic here, but please realize that if that (steadfastly
avoiding anything remotely connected to magic) were the case, we
should not be able to read the Bible, which has many stories in it
concerning witchcraft (1 Samuel 28 and Acts 8 to name a few), but all
are viewed in a bad light. Sorcery exists, I hate to admit it, but
it's real. It is evil, and must be seen as such.
I
add this warning as well: I shall be discussing things that are
deeper than a G level. If you are squeamish, I would recommend you
proceed or don't proceed with your own discretion.
So,
are you ready? In a nutshell, these are the magic differences between
LOTR/Narnia and Harry Potter:
As
the main character of the Harry Potter stories, Harry Potter
is a human boy practicing occult magick for his own benefit with
copyable spells in a fictionalized part of our world. The Lord of the
Rings and Narnia stories take place in a make believe world where
magic is a power given by a higher being to certain nonhuman,
secondary characters to be used for the good of others.
Now,
let's break that down a bit into various points...
1.
The Source of the Magic
The
magic in LOTR and Narnia is very, very similar and thus I will be
linking it together in many of the following points, first describing
the situation in Harry Potter and then following up with a contrast
in LOTR and Narnia. When studying the issue of magic, one of the
first things you must look to is the source of that magic.
Should I write that again in all caps? THE SOURCE!!! Where did the
magic come from? This is one of the biggest and most important
points.
The
problem with the English language is that we use one word to mean so
many different things. Consider the simple, little word ball.
Usually, nowadays when we hear that word we think of a fun, bouncy
plaything, right? Jane Austen wouldn't have thought of such a
plaything, but rather a party in which dancing was a common
occurrence. Look at two different definitions of the word train:
to educate and to teach; also, a string of railroad cars powered by
steam, diesel fuel, or electricity. The same thing happens with the
word magic. However, we do have a small change to the spelling
of the word at times to help us distinguish what exactly we're
talking about. Add a “k” on the end and we now have the word
magick, which is not the same as magic. Magick (with a
“k”) is what is in Harry Potter (more on that later).
God
clearly condemns witchcraft in many passages in the Bible, one of the
most famous being Deuteronomy 18:10-12: “There shall not be found
among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through
the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an
enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar
spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things
are an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations
the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee.” (more on
this in a bit)
The
magick in the stories of Harry Potter Wikipedia defines as “a
natural force that can be used to override the usual laws
of nature.”
The spells and chants that Harry Potter indulges in has been directly
linked with occult magick, witchcraft and sorcery that gets its power
from the king of darkness himself, Satan. J. K. Rowling has claimed
that the magick in her works is nothing more than a make believe
magic, a magic that she believes doesn't exist, but the type of
magick in Harry Potter is real. Occult magick IS real. So... how do I
know it's occult magick? Well, let's do some definitions here: occult
magick includes the practices of divination, astrology, witchcraft,
charms, spells, wizardry, and necromancy (communicating with the
dead). Harry goes to school to learn these things. Spells that Harry
casts consist of the gesturing of a wand combined with a verbal or
mental incantation; they are an every day occurrence, along with
charms, used on both friends and enemies in and out of the school.
Some of Harry's friends consist of dead spirits who have been
summoned to the present, and one of his classes is distinctly labeled
as a divination class.
 |
| Gandalf |
In
contrast, the Wikipedia page on Magic in Middle Earth (the fantasy
world in LOTR) states that magic here is defined as mystical,
paranormal, or supernatural activity. This magic bears no
resemblance to occult magick, and both Tolkien and Lewis describe it
as coming from a higher being, a Creator. In Lord of the Rings, this
higher being (whom Tolkien calls Iluvatar, meaning “Father of All”)
gives magic to his servants (namely the wizards, and specifically
Gandalf and Saruman) to do good and benefit the people. Iluvatar is a
god figure, the god figure in LOTR, although he is never mentioned by
name in the series. Readers can become acquainted with him in The
Silmarillion, which I would recommend reading. These wizards
(more on wizards in users of magic) cannot use the power for their
own purposes, and when Saruman tries to do just that, he does not
live long and sees a most bitter end. Gandalf, on the other hand,
uses the power given him to help fight the coming darkness and
destroy the evil that would pollute the world. In the end, good
prevails and Gandalf's denouement is one of happiness.
In
Narnia, Aslan's powers are from his father, the Great King; again, a
higher being who is shown as the one true god and Creator of Narnia.
Aslan mentions the Deep Magic in Narnia many times, but you must
realize that what is meant by “the Deep Magic” is supernatural
power, which does indeed exist! Christ used supernatural power to
raise Lazarus from the dead. In the Companion to Narnia, we
learn that the Deep Magic is twofold: the Deep Magic and the Deeper
Magic. The Deep Magic is defined as "the effects of justice in a
created word, existing from the dawn of time." The Deeper Magic is
eternal, from before the dawn of time, connoting a self sacrifice.
But
how is it that I believe the magic in Narnia and LOTR to be good,
while in Harry Potter it is bad? Let's go back to the verses in
Deuteronomy and define each of the things that God condemns. The
practice of having children pass through the fire (also known as
febration) was common in the pagan nations around Israel back
in Bible times. The parents who sent their sons and daughters through
the flames did so to obtain an oracle or to avert national disaster.
The fire was a purification process, namely to purify something by
sacrifice, and bluntly, it was a human sacrifice by fire. Ugh! Is
anyone else repressing disgusted shudders at this? Now, I'm not aware
that Harry has to pass through any fire at any time in the series to
purify himself, but as God had Moses mention febration in the verse,
I thought I should mention it as well.
Divination
Noah Webster gives this definition: the act of divining; a
foretelling future events, or discovering things secret or obscure,
by the aid of superior beings, or by other than human means. But
wait! Superior beings? Can't that be the same as Aslan's father and
Tolkien's Iluvatar? Let's keep reading. The ancient heathen
philosophers divided divination into two kinds, natural and
artificial. Natural divination was supposed to be effected by a kind
of inspiration or divine afflatus; artificial divination was effected
by certain rites, experiments or observations, as by sacrifices,
cakes, flour, wine, observation of entrails, flight of birds, lots,
verses, omens, position of the stars, etc. Occult magick is this
artificial divination. I'm certain that Harry Potter wouldn't have
been studying divination and learning by the aid of the One who we
see as the Superior Being in our world, the Lord God. And if it is
not of God, it is of the devil.
 |
| White Witch |
An
observer of times. It's wrong to look at clocks? No, I don't
think that's what's meant here. This is also translated as “one who
practices witchcraft.” Make sense now? But what is witchcraft? Back
to handy dandy Webster: the practices of witches; sorcery;
enchantments; intercourse with the devil.
The
next couple of ones listed in Deuteronomy are grouped together with
the times observer: an enchanter, a witch, and a charmer. These are
also respectively translated as “one who interprets omens, a
sorcerer, and a one who casts a spell.” I don't think it's
necessary for me to give more than just the definitions. Enchanter:
one who enchants; one who has spirits and demons at his command;
one who practices enchantment, or pretends to perform surprising
things by the agency of demons. Witch: a woman who, by compact
with the devil, practices sorcery or enchantment. Charmer: one
that charms, or has power to charm; one that uses or has the power of
enchantment. Sorcerer: a conjurer; an enchanter; a magician.
But
we're not quite done yet with Deuteronomy. Moses also lists “a
consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.”
Again, translated also as: “a medium, or a spiritist, or who calls
up the dead.” A wizard is described as an enchanter and a sorcerer.
Necromancer: one who pretends to foretell future events by holding
converse with departed spirits; a conjurer. Please notice that
Deuteronomy 18: 11 specifically says “familiar spirits.” Those
who take part in this magick are not doing so by accident. The
spirits, to them, are familiar, and they know exactly what they're
doing. I realize I'm posting a lot of definitions, but I want you to
understand what I'm talking about. This is what God is condemning.
It's basically performing by the power of the devil. That's magick.
And that's exactly what's in Harry Potter.
Okay,
are you still with me? I realize that was a tremendously long point,
but the source of the magic really is the key difference between
Harry Potter and LOTR/Narnia.
Although
I really could just stop here as this issue of the source of the
magic is the biggest and most imporant issue overall, let's keep
going... there was some more stuff that I dug up, so I'm not done
yet.
2.
The Characters Who Use Magic
 |
| Harry Potter |
Harry
Potter is a human boy; there can be no mistaking that. He is born in
England to human parents and, for the most part, lives with other
humans. As he is the main character of the Harry Potter series, this
shows magick as being a (I quote) “safe and lawful occupation,”
thus encouraging readers to become more interested in it. Because
Harry is their peer and role model, readers will strive to be like
him, and as Harry uses magick and it's fine for him to do so, they
assume the same about themselves. Pretty much this is the reasoning:
Harry is human, just as we are, and because Harry is just like us, we
can be just like him. Unfortunately, to be just like Harry is to
practice the dark magick of the devil. To give you a statistic, a
poll was taken a few years ago in which one out of ten
children admitted that they were more interested in witchcraft after
reading Harry Potter. Human characters acting as peers and role
models and using magick are a dangerous thing as it encourages
readers in the wrong directions.
Look
at Lord of the Rings next. No peers are using magick or magic, but
rather it is the mentor figures who have power. Gandalf and Saruman
are called wizards. GASP! They're called wizards! Does that
automatically make them bad? Before you judge, look at the context in
which the word “wizard” is used. Tolkien describes Gandalf as one
of the Istari, meaning messenger. The Istari were given power
from the Creator (Iluvatar) to help and use for the benefit of others
(look at purpose of magic), and these messengers do not call
themselves “wizards.” When they appeared in Middle Earth, men
were confused by their existence, as their power was something they
could not understand. It was men who, in their ignorance, gave the
Istari the name of wizards. The magic of these “wizards”
is nothing like the occult magick of Harry Potter. Instead, it is
like the power that Christ gave to his disciples, allowing them the
ability to heal the sick and injured, cast out demons, and perform
other miracles in His name.
 |
| Galadriel |
But
what of the Elves? They live in secluded places away from men and
dwarves and hobbits and are seen by every other race to be oh so
mysterious. They have magic, right? To answer bluntly, no. Not
really. Their magic (I'm quoting here) “in the context of
Middle Earth is in no way connected to supernatural power. It is a
natural attribute, one that is given only to Elves, not
humans.” Tolkien disliked using the word magic to describe
the elves' natural abilities, but there wasn't another word to
describe it. The other races (men, dwarves, orcs, and hobbits) called
the elves' skill magic because they themselves couldn't
understand it.
Moving
on to Narnia. Like LOTR, magic is used by secondary, non-human
characters. Aslan is the Great Lion, the Son of the Emperor over the
Sea, the Real King of Narnia. As I have said before, Aslan is a god
figure (please read the section on god figures in my earlier post),
and I think all of this qualifies him as not a human.
So,
what other Narnian characters use magic? Coriakin (from Voyage of the
Dawn Treader) uses magic, is called a magician (and the
Oppressor by the Dufflepods), and is a star. Yes, I said “star.”
Coriakin may be wizard-like in appearance, but Lewis made him that
way to separate him from the normal, human characters in his stories.
The white beard and long robes are typical elements in a wizard's
appearance, so that's how Lewis made Coriakin. Ramandu, in the same
Narnia book (Dawn Treader), is also a star and the same things apply
to him.
 |
| Oreius |
Then
we have centaurs. Glenstorm is a centaur gifted with the ability to
prophesy, and there are others who have the gift of prophecy as well.
However, we must realize that the gift of prophecy given by Aslan
(the Superior Being) to the centaurs is the same as the gift of
prophecy given by God that Paul mentions in Romans 12.
Lewis
was careful to include a cautionary note with the magic in his
stories. Some of the characters (Lucy, Digory, and others) use magic
objects in the stories. For instance, Digory uses the magic rings in
The Magician's Nephew to go to the wood between the worlds and
get Polly after Uncle Andrew sent her there. However, this is where
the cautionary note comes in. Later, as Digory and Polly explore the
desolate world of Charn, Digory rings the golden bell and wakes the
evil queen, Jadis. The same thing happens with Lucy: she reads a
spell out of Coriakin's book to free the Dufflepods from their
invisibleness but falls to temptation in the same book and eavesdrops
wrongly on her friends. Magic can bring about both good and bad
results and is not something that should be taken lightly.
3.
The Realm of Magic
The
realm of magic is closely linked with the characters who use magic.
And with the knowledge of magic's existence. Actually, these points
are all pretty much linked together. Harry
Potter
takes place in a fictionalized part of our own, real world. The
school Hogwarts that Harry attends is found in Scotland and is
only accessible to wizards and other “magical” creatures. Humans,
or “Muggles” in Harry's vocabulary, cannot get to this wizard
world, but rather, they see only ruins of an old castle and several
warnings of danger.
 |
| The Pevensies discovering Narnia |
Okay,
so Harry Potter lived in England. So what? This (and I quote here)
“brings the practice of magic imaginatively far closer to the
personal condition and experience of the young reader.” Because
Harry lives in the same world that we do, there is a fine to no line
between what is real and what is fantasy. I've said before, the
magick Harry practices is real, quite real. Going back to what I said
about peers: because Harry Potter is living in the same world we live
in, we can do anything Harry does. That's the danger.
Narnia
and LOTR both take place in make believe worlds, worlds that C. S.
Lewis and J. R. R. Tolkien respectively made up. As much as some of
us would like it, we cannot go to Middle Earth or Narnia. There is a
thick, definite line between reality and fantasy here, people. The
magic here is, again, shown in a light where it cannot be copied.
4.
The Knowledge of Magic's Existence
In
the world of Hogwarts, the knowledge of magic is kept as a secret.
Wizards and witches are encouraged not to show their powers to those
who are not involved in magic, or muggles (humans). This corresponds
directly with the occult idea, as the word “occult” literally
means “hidden.” Magic is the main theme throughout the story and
has been described as Harry's salvation, his means of getting through
hard times and winning in the end.
The
existence of magic is common knowledge in Narnia and Middle Earth. It
is limited as to who can use it, but the knowledge that it exists and
is real is openly acknowledged. However, though magic is common
knowledge, it is used sparingly, and the characters do not depend on
the magic to help them through their difficulties. The trials and
battles they fight on their own, without any assistance from magic.
 |
| Aslan and Edmund |
This
point isn't necessarily as important as the source of the magic, but
as it is a difference in the issue of magic between Harry Potter and
Lord of the Rings/Narnia, I deemed it important based on a passage in
2 Corinthians 4. God wants our actions to be out in the light, as
things often done in hiding are of a darker nature. True, I realize
that some actions we do are meant to be secret (I'm talking about
giving without thought of reparation or glory), but be careful about
something that is so solidly secreted under lock and key. What is it
and what's the purpose of its being secret? There's where you have to
look.
5.
The Purpose in Using Magic
This
links right up with the two points flanking this one: the knowledge
of magic and the acquisition of magic. Harry Potter learns magick to
accomplish his own goals. It's his salvation, his means of getting
things done. Magic is his whole life, in a sense. Whatever he does
with magick is done with the intent of bringing benefit to himself.
Sure, he may save his world once or twice during the course of the
novels, but he does so by the use of magick and by the power of the
devil, the master of chaos and destruction. Now, I'm not sure about
you, but that seems a little backwards to me.
In
contrast, Gandalf from LOTR is given power for the express purpose of
helping and aiding others. The power given to the wizards by the
Creator Illuvatar is meant to benefit those with whom the wizards
come in contact. The same goes for Aslan in Narnia: his powers as the
Son of the Emperor over the sea are used for the good of others.
Those in LOTR and Narnia who use power for their own benefit, such as
Saruman and the White Witch, do so at their own peril and are
destroyed in the end.
 |
| Orcs marching to Helm's Deep |
To
wrap up this point, even if you don't look at the all-important issue
of the source of the magic, I view Harry's powers as bad because he
uses them for selfish reasons. How can anything be good when it's
used in selfishness? Granted, this point isn't very big in the
overall issue of magic and magick, but it is a big difference between
the power used in LOTR/Narnia and Harry Potter.
6.
The Acquisition of Magic
Harry
Potter learns how to perform magick throughout the entire series.
Indeed, the main idea of the books and films is his education
in the world of magick. He goes to a boarding school, Hogwarts, and
is instructed in the ways of magick. Thus, by following Harry's
adventures in that boarding school, the reader learns right along
with him about the magick, what it's used for, and, the most
dangerous aspect, how to use it themselves. At the risk of sounding
redundant, the magick in Harry Potter is real! That fact cannot be
ignored. It's dangerous and evil, and must be seen as such.
 |
| Legolas |
Whereas,
the magical characters in Narnia and LOTR already have their magic
when the stories take place, and the reader is not given details on
how they acquired that magic nor are they encouraged to dwell on the
actual process of getting magic. No character within any of the
stories goes through the learning process of how to use magic.
Again,
not a huge point, but one that definitely is worth mentioning.
Conclusion
If
you're still reading this, I applaud you for getting this far. I
realize that this was a rather lengthy post, so I'll hurry up and end
this before I turn this into a novel. Please remember, I am not
trying to challenge anyone's beliefs or convictions. I am simply
presenting my research. Questions, comments... post as many as you
would like, and I will do my best to respond accordingly.
 |
| The Fellowship of the Ring |
As
a final word, I would encourage you all not to take my word as golden
truth. Look it up for yourselves. Discuss it with your parents. Pray
about it. Dig into the Word of God and search some of these points
out for yourself.
The
following are links I used as part of my research for this post
(other sources are listed in this post):
Thanks for reading!
